Tracy Cooper on PalladioBy James T. Preston Jr. | Sunday, May 4, 2008 With his influence on style ranging from the University of Virginia to the old Irish Parliament Building and countless others around the globe, Andrea Palladio has justifiably been called the most influential architect in the Western world. But despite his great influence both during and after his lifetime, he never achieved the success he desired. This year, the Hood Museum at Dartmouth is celebrating the 500th anniversary of his birth and his impact on design. As part of the quincentennial celebration, Dartmouth invited Tracy Cooper, professor of Italian architecture at Temple University and author of Palladio’s Venice, to speak about the political environment in which Palladio operated. ![]() — Andrea Palladio — With the struggle for identity as well as the fight between the republicans trying to maintain the urban way of life and the emerging capitalists looking inland, architecture held a great significance. The republicans clung to the traditional building styles of old Venice, while the capitalists supported the revival of classical Greek and Roman themes that prevailed in other Italian cities. It was in this charged environment that Andrea Palladio worked and rose to prominence. Though he trained locally as a stonecutter early on, Palladio later travelled to Rome and received an excellent humanist education. He learned from Daniele Barbaro, an intellectual Venetian official, to think of architecture as a science, a paradigm that profoundly influenced his work. The idea was that building does not consist of merely copying other structures; rather, each building should be approached as a problem which must be solved. The influence can be seen in his villas: they have perfect symmetry and proportionality, yet they also have porticos to admire the countryside and flanking wings to accommodate the livestock and other elements of farms. Back in Venice, Palladio had a somewhat irregular position, as he was did not rise through the ranks like typical architects. On top of this, unlike several contemporary architects who enjoyed success, he was unwilling to dilute the classical style through compromise with the traditional. It was because of this that Palladio was never able to build the lavish palaces on the Grand Canal that he dreamed of—he was too controversial. But following 1540, he enjoyed success building great country estates for the wealthy. |
Article ToolsRelated Articles
|
|
|
Copyright © 1996-2009 The Dartmouth Review |
||