• Dartlog
  • Features
  • Arts & Culture
  • Indian Sport
  • Editor's Corner
  • About Us
  • Archive
  • Subscribe & Donate

  • Dartlog
  • Features
  • Arts & Culture
  • Indian Sport
  • Editor's Corner
  • About Us
  • Archive
  • Subscribe & Donate

Top
  • Dartlog
  • Features
  • Arts & Culture
  • Indian Sport
  • Editor's Corner
  • About Us
  • Archive
  • Subscribe & Donate
Search
Follow Us!
Follow @DartmouthReview
Loading..
  • Arts & Culture RSS
  • Back Page RSS
  • Dartlog RSS
  • Features RSS
  • Indian Sport RSS
Donate!

Shop TDR!
  • TDR Essentials
    • TDR and Indian Gear
    • TDR Pleads Innocent
      Our history in hardback
Contact Us!
This form does not yet contain any fields.


    Links
    • Our Esteemed Peers
      • The Binghamton Review
      • The California Review
      • The Carolina Review
      • The Cornell Insider
      • The Daily D
      • The Dartmouth Free Press
      • The Irish Rover
      • The Michigan Review
      • The Midway Review
      • The Northwestern Chronicle
      • The Observer at BC
      • The Oregon Commentator
      • The Portland Spectator
      • The Princeton Tory
      • The Purdue Review
      • Stance: For the Family
      • The Stanford Review
      • The Vanderbilt Torch
    • Dartmouth Blogs
      • Big Green Alert
      • Dartbeat
      • Dartblog
      • The Dunyun
    • Conservative Blogs
      • The Corner
      • Drudge Report
      • The Foundry
      • Hot Air
      • Instapundit/Pajamas Media
      • Little Green Footballs
      • Michelle Malkin
      • NewsBusters
      • Powerline
      • The Volokh Conspiracy
    Pics
    • Pictures
    « Making Carter Look Good | Main | TDR Foreign Policy Debate Live Blog »
    Thursday
    Nov242011

    Buying a 2400: The SAT Cheating Scandal

    Posted on DateNovember 24, 2011

    In the never-ending quest to get into America’s top colleges, some students have turned to a more insidious approach: cheating on the SAT and ACT. “Prosecutors said 15 high school students hired five other people for anywhere from $500 to $3,600 each to take the SAT or ACT for them,” reports Fox News. At least twenty current or former students from Great Neck, New York, a suburb of New York City, have been implicated in the scandal. While prosecutors suspect that forty students were involved in the cheating, the statute of limitations has expired for some of these students.

    After rumors of cheating arose at Great Neck North High School, administrators investigated the reports by looking at students who took the tests at a different school and whose academic record greatly differed from their test scores.  In late September, Nassau County prosecutors arrested Sam Eshaghoff, a 2010 graduate of Great Neck North High School, who allegedly took tests for six current Great Neck students. Since then, the case has expanded to two public schools and three private schools in the area. Prosecutors have charged the test takers with scheming to defraud, falsifying business records, and criminal impersonation.

    With more pressure than ever to get the highest test scores as possible to be more competitive for college admissions, it is not surprising that cheating has occurred. In fact, it would be astonishing if more instances of this type of cheating do not arise as the investigation continues. Affluent families already spend thousands or tens of thousands of dollars each year on private SAT tutoring so the idea that wealthy students would pay others to take the SAT for them is not unreasonable.

    Although the College Board has hired former FBI director Louis J. Freeh to investigate security issues with the test, the organization faces a monumental task. In 2010, 1,547,990 students took the SAT. Since many of the cheaters used fake IDs to pose as other students, effectively verifying the identities of so many people could be nearly impossible. There needs to be a more stringent process of authentication in order to uphold the legitimacy of the standardized test.

    While colleges look for students with high marks in math, reading, and writing, perhaps they should look for a fourth category: integrity.

    -Will Duncan

     

    Comment1 Comment | Email ArticleEmail Article | Print ArticlePrint Article
    tagged TagACT, TagCollege Board, TagGreat Neck, TagSAT, Tagcheating

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    Reader Comments (1)

    The SAT (and to lesser extent, ACT) is a racket that even when it isn't being cheated on fails to test most of the qualities that makes a good student excel. The type of thinking that makes one good at SAT like tests doesn't necessarily equate to being competent in any thing else. And because so much emphasis is put on tests like these, students either have to learn for the test at the exclusion of learning in other areas or to cut out any semblance of free time (assuming that high achievers have any in the first place kind of limits their options here).

    And so they study study study, and then someone else gets through the same test without studying because they paid off someone to take the test for them. This is hardly a fair system here. Dropping having a life and or time spent learning to be good at actual things that matter does not guarantee success even for the brightest students. Instead the win goes to people who have the money and the willingness to break the law.
    November 24, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterThe Other Dragon

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author:  (forget stored information)
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
    ↓ | ↑
     
    All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.

    Notify me of follow-up comments via email.


      

    PostLink an External Response

    Have a response on your own site? You can either use the [Trackback URL] for this entry, or link to your response directly.

    I want to leave a comment directly on this site »
    Article Title:
    Article URL:
    Article Excerpt (optional):
    Site Name:
    Site URL (optional):
    Author Name:

    Copyright © 2011, The Dartmouth Review. All rights reserved. Nemo me impune lacessit. Privacy Policy