Kumar Garg, who doubts we’re well read, writes:
I guess being a conservative really is a disease. So says a British psych study which “has concluded that conservatism can be explained psychologically as a set of neuroses rooted in “fear and aggression, dogmatism and the intolerance of ambiguity”. …
The first sentence of the article:
A study funded by the US government has concluded that conservatism can be explained psychologically as a set of neuroses rooted in “fear and aggression, dogmatism and the intolerance of ambiguity”.
One wonders if Garg even read the article?
Some might remember that this was big news, oh, a month or so ago, which is a long time on this Internet-thing, right?
Be the first to comment on "Well read?"